Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1562 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 239 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €349.99 vs €690.13
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75053 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
216
90.3765690376569%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€349.99
100%
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
41.030595813204506%
Multi-Core
7454
34.14097925159163%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |