Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3800X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1285 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3800X - 499 vs 428 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €290.43 vs €675.29
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900KS - €0.68 vs €1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 105 vs 150 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
50%
Price, €
€675.29
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
428
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |