Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700K - 166 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €293.68 vs €675.29
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KS - €2.16 vs €4.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.07/FPS
53%
Price, €
€675.29
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
81%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€293.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €293.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |