Buy on Amazon
€417.11
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1610 - 218 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i9-13900F Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.604395604395604%
Multi-Core
739
4.291770718392474%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
