Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-13900KF

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-13900KF: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KF

3.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Intel Core i9-13900KF Desktop-PC-Prozessor, 24 Kerne (8 P-Kerne und 16 E-Kerne) 36 M Cache, bis zu 5,8 GHz

Buy for 513.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 96 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KF

3.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Intel Core i9-13900KF Desktop-PC-Prozessor, 24 Kerne (8 P-Kerne und 16 E-Kerne) 36 M Cache, bis zu 5,8 GHz

Buy for 513.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 96 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF

  • Performs up to 35% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1610 - 300 vs 223 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

223

74%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Core i9-13900KF

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


FPS

300

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.71/FPS

100%

Price, €

€513.98

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KF Desktop-PC-Prozessor, 24 Kerne (8 P-Kerne und 16 E-Kerne) 36 M Cache, bis zu 5,8 GHz

Buy for 513.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 96 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Core i9-13900KF

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

14%

Multi-Core

739

3%

Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo
Core i9-13900KF

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


Single-Core

2973

100%

Multi-Core

20101

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

vs
Intel Core i9-13900KF Logo

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Sep 27th, 2022
CeleronCollectionCore i9
Ivy BridgeCodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
24
2Threads
32
2.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.0 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.8 GHz
55 W
TDP125 W
22 nmProcess Size
10 nm
26.0xMultiplier
30.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Core i9-13900KF

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.