Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900K - 168 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €425.94 vs €533.51
- Up to 17% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900KF - €2.65 vs €3.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.18/FPS
83%
Price, €
€533.51
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €533.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17396 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
95%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€425.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |