Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 194 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €425.94 vs €645.91
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - €2.2 vs €3.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€425.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3179 minutes ago
Buy for €645.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |