Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2894 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than Celeron G1610 - 71 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €288.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
19.46094106898127%
Multi-Core
739
6.077802450859446%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |