Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-10700F

Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-10700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F

  • Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 272 vs 233 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Ready or Not.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

233

85%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

272

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.9/FPS

100%

Price, €

€246.03

100%

FPS and Value Winner

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

26%

Multi-Core

739

10%

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1612

100%

Multi-Core

7231

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

vs
Intel Core i7-10700F Logo

Intel Core i7-10700F

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
CeleronCollectionCore i7
Ivy BridgeCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
2.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.9 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.8 GHz
55 W
TDP65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
26.0xMultiplier
29.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Core i7-10700F

Ready or Not, 1920 x 1080, Epic

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.