Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3694 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 40% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1610 - 310 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €314.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
14.926419060967064%
Multi-Core
739
4.99054565099946%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |