Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 67% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 256 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €526.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |