Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-13900 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Core i9-13900 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900 Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz

Buy for 526.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74230 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

4.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Prozessor mit 3D V-Cache-Technologie, 8 Kerne/16 verzerrte Threads, Zen 4-Architektur 104 M Cache, 120 W TDP, bis zu 5,0 GHz Boost-Frequenz, AMD 5, DDR5 & PCIe 5.0

Buy for 429.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74230 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900 Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz

Buy for 526.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74230 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

4.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Prozessor mit 3D V-Cache-Technologie, 8 Kerne/16 verzerrte Threads, Zen 4-Architektur 104 M Cache, 120 W TDP, bis zu 5,0 GHz Boost-Frequenz, AMD 5, DDR5 & PCIe 5.0

Buy for 429.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74230 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 7800X3D on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 and the cheaper Ryzen 7 7800X3D have been released at the same time.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 3% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 322 vs 313 FPS
  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

  • Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €429.99 vs €526.97
This is a free version of Diablo IV.
Diablo IV

Diablo IV

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

322

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€526.97

81%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900 Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz

Buy for 526.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74230 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

313

97.20496894409938%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€429.99

100%

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Prozessor mit 3D V-Cache-Technologie, 8 Kerne/16 verzerrte Threads, Zen 4-Architektur 104 M Cache, 120 W TDP, bis zu 5,0 GHz Boost-Frequenz, AMD 5, DDR5 & PCIe 5.0

Buy for 429.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74230 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

99.81610886355277%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2719

100%

Multi-Core

15172

92.36576159746744%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Jan 4th, 2023Release DateJan 4th, 2023
Core i9CollectionRyzen 7
Raptor LakeCodenameRaphael
Intel Socket 1700SocketAMD Socket AM5
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
24
Cores8
32
Threads16
2.0 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed5.0 GHz
65 W
TDP120 W
10 nmProcess Size
5 nm
20.0xMultiplier
42.0x
UHD Graphics 770Integrated GraphicsRadeon Graphics
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i9-13900 or Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Diablo IV, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.