Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 152 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €399.99 vs €630.9
- Up to 25% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900 - €3.1 vs €4.15 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €630.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
84%
Value, €/FPS
€3.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |