Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3970 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1610 - 193 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €512.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
13.706563706563706%
Multi-Core
739
3.5120235719038115%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |