Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-760 is 869 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 504 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
