Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-11900F

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-11900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900F

2.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Intel Core i9-11900F 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 2.5GHz Tuboboost: 5GHz, 8 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811900F

Buy for 300.59 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75789 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900F

2.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Intel Core i9-11900F 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 2.5GHz Tuboboost: 5GHz, 8 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811900F

Buy for 300.59 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75789 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3025 days newer than Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F

  • Performs up to 16% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1610 - 521 vs 449 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of DOOM Eternal.
DOOM Eternal

DOOM Eternal

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

449

86.18042226487525%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Core i9-11900F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

521

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€300.59

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900F 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 2.5GHz Tuboboost: 5GHz, 8 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811900F

Buy for 300.59 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75789 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Core i9-11900F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

19.62229387379088%

Multi-Core

739

8.058008941227783%

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Core i9-11900F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2171

100%

Multi-Core

9171

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

vs
Intel Core i9-11900F Logo

Intel Core i9-11900F

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
CeleronCollectionCore i9
Ivy BridgeCodenameRocket Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
2.6 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.5 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.2 GHz
55 W
TDP65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
26.0x
Multiplier25.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Core i9-11900F

DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.