Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 168% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G530 - 225 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €20.16 vs €425.94
- Up to 87% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-10900K - €0.24 vs €1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
12%
Price, €
€425.94
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |