Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 4140 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €20.16 vs €344.13
- Up to 90% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-13700F - €0.13 vs €1.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 69% better in Rust than Celeron G530 - 254 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
150
59%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17817 minutes ago
Buy for €344.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |