Buy on Amazon
€433.4
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 575 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 185 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €399.99 vs €433.4
- Up to 5% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-10900 - €2.22 vs €2.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i9-10900 (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box BX8070110900
Buy for €433.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15705 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
180
97%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2920X 3.5GHz 12-Core 24 Gewinde 32MB Cache TR4 Sockel OEM, YD292XA8UC9AF
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
