Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700KF - 137 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €383.39 vs €433.4
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900 - €2.82 vs €3.16 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €433.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15267 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
136
99%
Value, €/FPS
€2.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€383.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |