Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 97 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 60 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €383.39 vs €399.99
- Up to 23% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €6.39 vs €8.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€383.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |