Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9600KF - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €389.95 vs €433.4
- Up to 9% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900 - €3.17 vs €3.47 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €433.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16357 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
123
98%
Value, €/FPS
€3.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€389.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |