Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 840 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-7700T - 212 vs 200 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €174.0 vs €496.71
- Up to 63% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-9700F - €0.87 vs €2.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
37%
Price, €
€496.71
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |