Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €173.76 vs €580.2
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-13900F - €0.66 vs €2.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i7-7700T - 275 vs 264 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
264
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€173.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €173.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for €580.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |