Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €66.63 vs €101.9
- Up to 19% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-11400F - €0.44 vs €0.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-965 - 188 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 12 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
152
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17915 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
81%
Price, €
€101.9
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |