Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105F - 227 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €74.28 vs €101.9
- Up to 20% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11400F - €0.36 vs €0.45 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
80%
Price, €
€101.9
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11288 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |