Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 3000G - 213 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €69.0 vs €101.9
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11400F - €0.35 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
72%
Price, €
€101.9
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8028 minutes ago
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |