Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1602 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 2% better in Remnant II than Athlon 3000G - 85 vs 83 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
86.13861386138613%
Multi-Core
1975
65.33245120740986%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |