Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €80.0 vs €90.77
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 36% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Athlon 3000G - 102 vs 75 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74118 minutes ago
Buy for €90.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
66.55076495132128%
Multi-Core
1975
34.34185359067988%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |