Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 832 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €80.0 vs €102.0
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Athlon 3000G - 249 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78077 minutes ago
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78077 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.51618398637139%
Multi-Core
1975
28.311353211009177%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |