Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1555 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 185% better in League of Legends than FX-6200 - 148 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €42.6 vs €124.78
- Up to 2% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-6800K - €0.82 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
97%
Price, €
€124.78
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |