Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1620 - 196 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €20.16 vs €344.02
- Up to 93% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-13700KF - €0.12 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
6%
Price, €
€344.02
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €344.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
166
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |