Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 180 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €20.16 vs €271.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-12700F - €0.14 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €271 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
143
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |