Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 1370 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 116 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11800H - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11800H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |