Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 194 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €180.62 vs €209.12
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9600K - €1.0 vs €1.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
92%
Price, €
€209.12
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |