Buy on Amazon
€139.97
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $192
Availability
MSRP in USD: $192
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500T is 2225 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6200 - 104 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-9500T - €42.6 vs €139.97
- Up to 64% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9500T - €0.48 vs €1.35 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CPU Intel Core i5-9500T / LGA1151v2 / Tray ### 6 Kerne / 6 Threads / 9M Cache (erneuert)
Buy for €139.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9500T
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9500T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
| 6 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
