Buy on Amazon
€139.97
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $192
Availability
MSRP in USD: $192
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500T is 2036 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i5-3330 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 35 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-9500T - €40.13 vs €139.97
- Up to 71% better value when playing Control than Core i5-9500T - €0.2 vs €0.7 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
CPU Intel Core i5-9500T / LGA1151v2 / Tray ### 6 Kerne / 6 Threads / 9M Cache (erneuert)
Buy for €139.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
CHYYAC Intel Core I5-3330 I5 3330 3,0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Prozessor 6M 77W LGA 1155
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-9500T
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9500T | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
