Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-7600K - 243 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - €199.5 vs €203.31
- Up to 2% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-7600K - €0.82 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €203.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12889 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12888 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |