Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 219 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3500X - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €69.37 vs €216.77
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for €69.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
98.9710610932476%
Multi-Core
4626
79.07692307692308%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |