Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 230 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €82.0 vs €216.77
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
88.26086956521739%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€82
100%
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
76.28330084470434%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |