Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 158 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - €20.16 vs €51.13
- Up to 56% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-4690 - €0.14 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €51.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18168 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
143
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |