Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4440 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4440 is 272 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - €20.16 vs €59.04
- Up to 64% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i5-4440 - €0.1 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G1620 - 209 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
194
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |