Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 91 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - €20.16 vs €40.13
- Up to 50% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-3330 - €0.08 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
250
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |