Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-860 is 1182 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-860 - €20.16 vs €45.78
- Up to 55% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-860 - €0.23 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1620 - 90 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
89
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |