Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-3475S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1896 days newer than Core i5-3475S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3475S - 181 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |