Buy on Amazon
€290.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i5-3475S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2148 days newer than Core i5-3475S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than Core i5-3475S - 686 vs 616 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 16 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz, 8 Kerne, Socket AM4) YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3475S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3475S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
600
48.19277108433735%
Multi-Core
1660
27.15524292491412%
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-3475S or Ryzen 7 2700X
Minecraft, 1920 x 1080, High
580 FPS
€2.55/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Ryzen 7 2700X
32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€1,479
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
