Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 62 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6200 - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 6 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 371 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |