Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 581 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 7% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1820 - 78 vs 73 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €35.49 vs €74.91
- Up to 49% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-3450 - €0.49 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 53 vs 77 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €74.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
73
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |