Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1587 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 287 vs 271 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - €180.62 vs €235.2
- Up to 18% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-12500 - €0.67 vs €0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €235.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
271
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |