Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 45% better in War Thunder than Core i5-4440 - 230 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €59.04 vs €205.14
- Up to 58% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-11600K - €0.37 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
41%
Price, €
€205.14
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €205.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
159
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |